Defillama
Defillama stablecoins and the Limits of Market Size
Defillama stablecoins dashboards track circulating supply and peg data, allowing comparisons of market size, chain distribution, and price stability. Circulating supply describes tokens in circulation; peg data describes pricing relative to an intended reference value. A large supply does not establish strong backing or unrestricted redemption. Reading size alongside price behavior helps distinguish growth from price stress. Chain-level balances show distribution. They do not establish the token's backing mechanism or the liquidity available for a particular sale.
Key takeaway: A stablecoin's global supply does not establish the liquidity or redemption access available for a specific holding.
Market totals, individual assets, and chain views
The stablecoin dashboard brings market size and price behavior into the same comparison, while its chain views show where tracked supply resides. The market total describes the combined tracked value. An asset view describes one stablecoin's supply and price. A chain selection narrows the supply comparison to that network, so its smaller total does not imply the asset contracted globally. USDT and USDC appear among the tracked stablecoins, with price and off-peg information alongside market-cap changes. These fields distinguish an asset growing in size from an asset moving away from its target.
Chain distribution adds another dimension: a balance increase on one network can coexist with a decrease elsewhere. The applicable asset, reporting window, and chain scope determine whether two displayed changes describe the same movement.
Does a larger market cap mean a stronger peg?
A larger market cap measures scale; it does not establish the backing, redemption access, or market depth needed to explain peg resilience. Peg data records observed pricing relative to a target. A narrow deviation describes that observation, while future price stability depends on the asset's underlying mechanism and trading conditions. Distribution across several chains also does not create separate sources of backing when those deployments share the same issuer reserves.
Chain balances and issuance origins
Circulating balances on a network can include locally issued tokens and tokens arriving from another chain. The stablecoin adapter model distinguishes those origins and separately identifies unreleased reserves. This separation matters when comparing a token's overall issuance with its distribution across networks.
Locally issued and unreleased tokens
A minted balance records tokens issued on the named chain, excluding tokens bridged from elsewhere. An unreleased balance covers tokens which have never circulated and remain in a reserve wallet. Treating that reserve as active supply would overstate circulation. Unreleased tokens also differ from the financial assets an issuer holds to back a stablecoin.
Balances originating on another chain
A bridged balance identifies tokens originating outside the chain under examination, so the destination balance describes distribution; adding it to an already inclusive global total can count the same economic exposure again. The bridge label supplies origin context; it does not establish the backing or redemption terms of every token carrying the same ticker.
Supply trends and price movements
Supply changes describe how many tokens enter or leave circulation; price changes describe how the market values each token. A market-cap movement can reflect both. When the price remains near its target, growth in circulating supply offers a clearer explanation for an increase in market size, while a price dislocation changes that relationship even if the token count barely moves. The dashboard includes daily, weekly, and monthly change columns. Matching the observation period keeps comparisons interpretable. A weekly balance change and a current peg reading cover different time scopes and cannot establish which movement came first.
Dollar-denominated growth also needs a consistent valuation basis when the peg references another currency. A chain-specific balance change leaves the global circulation question open until the broader distribution also supports it.
Backing, redemption, and local liquidity
Stablecoin backing, issuer redemption, and trading liquidity explain different parts of price resilience. Circulating supply does not identify the value or accessibility of supporting assets, or the conditions governing conversion into the reference currency.
The token's backing mechanism determines which assets or arrangements support its target value. A supply chart cannot establish reserve composition, collateral sufficiency, or the obligations of an issuer. Those properties belong to the particular stablecoin's design and terms.
Redemption access can depend on the holder's eligibility and the stablecoin's terms. A market price near the target does not establish a holder's right to redeem directly, and a nominal redemption rate does not remove access conditions.
Trading liquidity concerns the market available for a sale. A large global supply can sit outside the specific pool or venue serving that trade. The Token Liquidity tool addresses market depth, which differs from the aggregate stablecoin balance.
A bridged representation can introduce an additional mechanism between the token held on one chain and its underlying asset. The relevant exposure follows that representation's actual backing and conversion path. Shared names alone do not establish identical rights across deployments.
Stablecoin market cap beside DeFi TVL
Defillama defines a chain's stablecoin market cap as the total market capitalization of stablecoins on that chain. Total value locked (TVL) measures eligible assets in protocol contracts. Circulating supply includes stablecoins held outside eligible protocol contracts. Stablecoins deposited into a protocol can also contribute to its TVL. Adding the two figures can double-count stablecoins already included in both.
Peg targets and observation windows
Peg deviation measures the relationship between an observed token price and its intended reference value. The currency and valuation convention determine what counts as a premium or discount; an arbitrary comparison with one dollar can misclassify another peg.
Fixed targets and other reference values
For a fixed target, percentage deviation equals observed price minus target price, divided by target price, and multiplied by 100. A negative value denotes a discount; a positive value denotes a premium. A dollar peg uses a dollar reference, while another currency requires its corresponding exchange value. Assets with variable reference values need that intended value, because appreciation against a fixed dollar benchmark need not indicate a broken mechanism.
Current and historical deviations
A current off-peg reading describes the price observation behind that field. The dashboard also labels a 30-day off-peg field, which introduces a different time scope. These figures do not reconstruct every trade or identify the cause of a deviation. A brief discount, persistent price pressure, and missing price data require different interpretations, even when the market-cap ranking stays unchanged.
A price check for an apparent depeg
An apparent depeg supports a price-stress conclusion only when the price and reference value describe the same asset, unit, and observation. A reported price below a valid fixed target indicates a discount. A blank field or mismatched reference leaves that conclusion unresolved.
Keep the same asset entry and align the comparison with its peg currency and target. If a price is unavailable, leave the deviation unclassified until a usable reading appears.
- Confirm whether the peg uses a fixed currency value or a variable reference.
- Match the displayed price unit to that reference.
- Keep the current observation separate from the historical field.
- Treat a blank price as unavailable, without classifying a deviation.
- Retain the asset's price scope when comparing it with a chain supply view.
A valid discount describes observed pricing. The proceeds of an actual sale depend on market depth, while direct redemption depends on the holder meeting the applicable access conditions.
Stablecoin exposure inside yield pools
A stablecoin yield position combines the token's peg exposure with the pool or protocol holding it. Stablecoin market-cap data describes the asset, while yield data describes the earning position. A rate therefore answers a different question from whether the deposited exposure stays near its reference value.
The underlying deposit assets
A pool can hold one stablecoin or several assets. Its underlying tokens determine the exposure. A stablecoin label does not establish that every asset in the position shares the same peg mechanism, and a token incentive can add a separate price exposure.
Liquidity at the lending-pool level
In the yields dataset, lending-pool TVL equals supplied value minus borrowed value. That balance describes available pool liquidity, unlike global stablecoin supply. A comparison centered on peg stability changes when the intended task becomes a withdrawal, a sale, or direct redemption: the applicable withdrawal terms, market depth, or redemption eligibility then become necessary.
Defillama stablecoins: the short answers
How often does Defillama update stablecoin supply figures?
Stablecoin supply figures follow an hourly update schedule. That schedule describes supply snapshots, so a dashboard total may not reflect issuance or burning between updates. It does not establish an identical refresh interval for every price field. Comparing changing balances requires observations from the same period, especially around a sharp move.
Why might stablecoin totals differ between the API and the dashboard?
The API updates before cached webpages, so matching views can temporarily show different stablecoin totals. Page caching can delay the visible update by up to one hour. Comparing an API total with a chain-filtered webpage introduces a separate scope difference, which persists even after both views refresh.
Can I export stablecoin data for a spreadsheet comparison?
The stablecoin dashboard provides CSV downloads for spreadsheet analysis. A download represents the data available at export time and does not update automatically as supply changes. Preserve the selected asset or chain scope and the relevant dates with the comparison. Combining snapshots from different periods can otherwise obscure the relationship between supply changes and price movements.
Does a stablecoin supply ranking count the people using each token?
A stablecoin supply ranking measures token value or circulating balances, not the number of people using each token. Neither quantity establishes how widely ownership spreads. Ownership distribution and distinct user counts require separate measures.
Is USDT dominance a percentage of all DeFi TVL?
USDT dominance expresses USDT's share of the stablecoin market-cap total, not its share of all DeFi TVL. Dominance can rise because USDT grows, other tracked stablecoins shrink, or both. A higher share during a shrinking stablecoin market does not necessarily mean USDT's own circulating balance increased.
What explains a rounded price beside a nonzero off-peg percentage?
Price rounding can conceal a small deviation which the off-peg percentage still displays. A price shown at the target and a small nonzero deviation therefore need not conflict. A rounded dollar price alone does not establish exact parity with a dollar peg.
· updated